Benjamin Franklin | Institute of Technology

Site Navigation

My Ben

Testimonials

  • Marcel
  • 2009 Medical Electronics Engineering Graduate
  • “I feel that I received a great amount of service from staff and faculty. They go over the limit, it is a great school. During my time at BFIT nobody ever said to me ‘no, I do not have time for you now’. They always found the time to help me with any issue. My experience at most places is that you pay for service and never get total customer satisfaction. Here at BFIT, you get the 100% or more! . Graduation is next month and I will miss this school very much. I hope to come back as a volunteer to help the students and encourage the students.”

Benjamin Franklin
Institute of Technology

  • 41 Berkeley Street
  • Boston, MA 02116
  • 617.423.4630
  • 877.400.BFIT (2348)

NEASC Self Study

Benjamin Franklin Institute of Technology is accredited through The New England Association of Schools and Colleges (NEASC). Because accreditation is a process of self regulation, it requires that institutions engage periodically in a comprehensive and candid self-study of their own strengths and weaknesses. Self-study is at the heart of accreditation. In preparation for the next re-accreditation site visit by a NEASC visiting team in November 2011, the college will begin a comprehensive self-study process in January 2010.

NEASC is one of six regional accrediting bodies in the United States, is a voluntary, non-profit, self-governing organization having as its primary purpose the accreditation of educational institutions. Through its evaluation activities, carried out by six commissions, the Association provides public assurance about the educational quality of those schools and colleges that seek or wish to maintain membership, which is synonymous with accreditation.

Institutions of higher learning achieve accreditation from the New England Association through its Commission on Institutions of Higher Education by demonstrating they meet the Commission's Standards for Accreditation and comply with its policies. The Standards for Accreditation establish criteria for institutional quality. In addition, the Commission adopts policies that elucidate the Standards and relate to their application. Moreover, the Commission expects affiliated institutions to work toward improving their quality, increasing their effectiveness, and continually striving toward excellence. Its evaluative processes are designed to encourage such improvement.

Each of the eleven Standards articulates a dimension of institutional quality. In applying the Standards, the Commission assesses and makes a determination about the effectiveness of the institution as a whole. The institution that meets the Standards:

  • has clearly defined purposes appropriate to an institution of higher learning;
  • has assembled and organized those resources necessary to achieve its purposes;
  • is achieving its purposes;
  • has the ability to continue to achieve its purposes.

The self-study process is intended to be open and transparent. The self-study document will synthesize information gathered from faculty, students, staff, board members and the community. Committees for each of the eleven standards will work in coordination with the steering committee.

Steering Committee

  • Karen Diaz
  • Brittanie Greco
  • Kathleen Lynch
  • Chris Morss
  • Paul Zarbo

Standard Committees

  • Standard One: Mission and Purposes
  • Paul Zarbo
  • Standard Two: Planning and Evaluation
  • Kathleen Lynch
  • Standard Three: Organization and Governance
  • Maureen Pompeo
  • Standard Four: The Academic Program
  • Jackie Cornog
  • Standard Five: Faculty
  • Barney Barnhart
  • Standard Six: Students
  • Dave Drucker
  • Standard Seven: Library and Other Information Resources
  • Sharon Bonk
  • Standard Eight: Physical and Technological Resources
  • Steve Lozen
  • Standard Nine: Financial Resources
  • Steve Lozen
  • Standard Ten: Public Disclosure
  • Jamey Palmieri
  • Standard Eleven: Integrity
  • Karen Diaz

NEASC Self-Study Timeline

Establish process and begin to create teams Spring 2010
Teams begins to gather information and data Spring 2010
Teams begin to analyze information/data and begin writing Summer/Fall 2010
Produce preliminary draft self-study December 1, 2010
Gather comments on draft self-study from community Jan/Feb 2011
Refine draft self-study March 2011
Draft self-study sent to NEASC for preliminary review April 2011
Refine draft self-study based on NEASC comments May/June 2011
Submit final self-study to NEASC August 1, 2011
Site visit November 6-9, 2011

Footer Information